Office 548, Bldg. 1, 55/59 Bolshaya Pochtovaya St., Moscow 105082 (Elektrozavodskaya metro station)

+7 (499) 755-54-96
+7 (916) 007-81-01
sales@cifp.ru
RUEN

1C:ERP project review with an expert and 1C:ERP project manager

Anton Kulish
1C:ERP project manager · 18 years in 1C
Free · 30 minutes · online 1C:UPP support ends April 1, 2027

Let’s review your 1C:ERP project with an expert and 1C:ERP project manager

Migrating from 1C:UPP, a stalled implementation, doubts about your contractor, holding consolidation. In 30 minutes, I’ll look at your situation through the eyes of a project manager who runs these projects himself — and send you a next-steps plan you can show to the owner.

For manufacturing companies and holdings with revenue of RUB 600 million (≈ $6 million) or more — owners, CFOs, CIOs, and chief accountants.

If you don’t need an implementation partner, I’ll tell you so.

Anton Kulish, 1C:ERP project manager, in a panel discussion at the Infostart conference “Analysis & Management in IT Projects”, 2024
Leads and oversees 1C:ERP and 1C:ERP.UH projects. Started out as a 1C analyst and developer.
18 years
in 1C projects
100+
people in the project office
RUB 150+ million
project portfolio
Only
189
days left until 1C:UPP support ends
Timeline

The migration from 1C:UPP should have started yesterday. As usual. We’ll make it — if we stick to the plan.

A full migration to 1C:ERP takes 7–15 months, so it can no longer be completed in full before the deadline. But you can migrate safely: first, whatever you need to file statutory reports, then everything else.

31.12.2026
last scheduled updates
01.2027
legislative changes no longer supported in 1C:UPP
01.04.2027
support ends completely
43%
of surveyed companies say their ERP is not fully implemented or needs optimization
10,3%
— only this share of companies has truly made ERP the core of their management
70%+
of recently implemented ERP systems will not fully meet their original goals by 2027
What people bring to a review

Choose your situation

This way I’ll know in advance what you’re coming with and prepare examples at your scale.

Tight deadlineOwner · CFO · CIO

Go-live on January 1, and we’re just starting

Only a few months are left until the new year, and a typical 1C:ERP project takes about a year. It feels like there’s no way to make it.

At the review
Whether it’s realistic in your case and what to launch first by January 1. We use artificial intelligence to make every project stage roughly twice as fast.
That’s me →
Owner · CFO · Chief accountant

We’re still on 1C:UPP

Support is ending, and the migration project hasn’t started yet or is just getting underway.

At the review
Migration sequence and timeline for your scale, and what to do about 2026–2027 reporting.
That’s me →
Owner · CFO

The project is underway but stalling

Deadlines have slipped, the budget keeps growing, and there’s no end in sight.

At the review
Where the project is losing time and money, and what to do in the next month.
That’s me →
Owner · CIO

I have doubts about our contractor

I can’t tell whether the team is doing a good job or what I’m paying for.

At the review
Criteria for assessing your contractor, and questions worth asking them.
That’s me →
Owner · CFO · Production

Implemented, but it doesn’t work as it should

Costs don’t reconcile, planning lives in Excel, and people work in two systems.

At the review
Where to start fixing it: what to keep, what to refine, and what to redo.
That’s me →
CFO · Owner

Holding: consolidation and 1C:ERP.UH

We spend weeks compiling group reports manually.

At the review
Architecture options for your legal entity structure and their budget implications.
That’s me →
Owner · CIO

A management question about the project

Who should lead the project on our side, how to motivate people, and how to avoid repeating other people’s mistakes.

At the review
A specific answer to your question — from practice, not from a textbook.
That’s me →
Short answers

Questions people bring to me

The answer for your company comes at the review. Here is what almost always holds true.

“We’re on 1C:UPP — will we manage to migrate before support ends?”Owner · CFO · Chief accountant

Not in full: a complete migration takes 7–15 months, and from April 1, 2027, there will be no 1C:UPP support at all. But you can migrate safely in stages: first statutory accounting from the start of the period so you don’t miss reporting deadlines, then warehouse, production, and management accounting.

At the review: a migration sequence tailored to your scale.

“The budget keeps growing — new hours every month”CFO · Owner

A growing budget is a symptom: customizations instead of out-of-the-box functionality, and no change control. What works is a stage-by-stage budget and a change log, where every change is estimated and approved before work starts, not after.

“They pitched stars, but juniors do the work”CIO

Key roles should be assigned by name in the contract, together with a replacement rule. And check who actually writes the technical specifications and runs meetings with your users.

“Costs in the ERP don’t add up — we calculate them in Excel”CFO · Chief accountant

Usually the problem is not the calculation but the source data: BOMs, consumption rates, routings, and overhead allocation. At the RubEx Group holding, the costing method was built on the out-of-the-box functionality of 1C:ERP.UH. You can’t find the error in the infobase in 30 minutes, but you can understand where to look.

I covered this in detail in the webinar “Costing and pricing in 1C:ERP”.

“Foremen don’t enter data — it’s sabotage”Production · Owner

People don’t sabotage the system; they sabotage extra work. What helps is a minimum of actions at the workstation, a clear “enter data — get value” link, and metrics that managers actually look at. Key users of the project need to be partially relieved of their day-to-day work, and project goals should be included in their KPIs.

“It takes us weeks to compile holding reports manually”CFO · Owner

The architecture has to be decided at the outset: 1C:ERP at the plants and 1C:ERP.UH for consolidation and budgeting — or a single infobase. This choice determines your budget for years to come.

“We need to go live on January 1. Can ERP realistically be implemented in 3 months?”Owner · CFO · CIO

Not in full in 3 months: a 1C:ERP project usually takes about 12 months. But we use AI tools at every stage — from business analysis and design to testing and data migration — and complete stages roughly twice as fast. So there is a chance to make it. And if the full scope won’t fit by January 1, we’ll propose a solution for your situation.

At the review: what you can realistically launch by January 1.

“They promised one year — we’re in year three. What’s going on?”Owner

Projects almost never stall because of 1C — they stall because of management. First, I look at three signs: whether the project scope and acceptance criteria are fixed, who makes decisions on your side, and how many questions have been left unanswered for more than two weeks.

“How can I tell if the contractor is doing a good job?”Owner · CFO

By three signs. You have the project documents in hand: the process model, technical specifications, and decision logs. You can see who on the team is doing what. Results are shown in regular live demos in the system, not just in reports. If you don’t have the documents, you already depend on the contractor.

“The system has been rewritten so heavily that we can’t update it”CIO · Chief accountant

Customizations should be made through extensions rather than by modifying the standard configuration, and every deviation from the standard should be justified. If the configuration has already been “taken off vendor support,” you can return to the standard gradually. The scope of this work can be estimated in advance.

“We bought planning, but the plan still lives in Excel”Production

Planning in ERP works only if your standards data (BOMs, routings, consumption rates) is of good quality. Start with the planning level your data can actually support, not with an operation-level schedule right away.

“Nobody runs the project on our side — everything comes down to me”Owner · CIO

The client-side project manager is a key role, and it doesn’t have to be the CIO. You need someone with the authority to make accounting decisions and with dedicated time for the project. Often it’s the CFO or their deputy.

“The previous contractor made a mess. How do we avoid a repeat?”Owner · CIO

Start not by choosing a new contractor but with a short audit: what to keep, what to redo, and which decisions were wrong. Otherwise the new contractor will go down the whole path again — at your expense.

Anton Kulish gives the lecture “Top 10 ERP go-live mistakes” at DKC, March 2026
Lecture “Top 10 ERP go-live mistakes” at DKC, March 2026
18 years
in 1C projects
100+
people in the project office
21 600
employees at the client — Bashkirenergo
150+
users I trained personally
Who runs the review

I started as an analyst — so I see the project from the inside, not through presentations

Anton Kulish leads and oversees 1C:ERP and 1C:ERP.UH projects. He rose from developer and analyst to head of a project office, running several projects at once with a team of 100+ people. A technical education and research work before 1C taught him to calculate rather than take things on trust.

2008
NUST MISIS, Faculty of Physical Chemistry; before that, the Correspondence School of Physics and Technology at MIPT, graduated with honors. Research: modeling, a project funded by General Electric.
2009–2013
1C developer, consultant, and business analyst. 1C:ERP at Techsnabexport (Rosatom group), 1C:EAM (TOiR) at PetrozavodskMash, 1C:MDM at Bashkirenergo.
2014–2021
Lead consultant and project manager. 1C:ERP at a defense enterprise in Kovrov, 1C:ERP go-live at the PIK-Element assembly-line plant.
2021 — present
1C:ERP / ERP.UH project manager and supervisor at Tsifrovizatsiya Proizvodstva (CIFP): KFC Russia, RubEx Group, Biofood.
1C:Accounting PROF1C:IFRS PROFProject management, HSE UniversityMIRBIS business schoolEnglish C1Interview in Russian Engineer magazine, 2026
Projects

The scale I’ve worked at

KFC Russia

Oracle JD Edwards → 1C:ERP + 1C:Catering
Objective
Replace Oracle, which had exited the market, for the management company, the franchise network, and 80 restaurants.
Role
Project manager, then project supervisor; a team of four contractors.
Result
Go-live on July 1, 2023. The number of IT systems went from 8 to 5; treasury moved to 1C:ERP.
80
restaurants
200
user seats
12
months

RubEx Group

1C:UPP → 1C:ERP.UH
Objective
The holding is Russia’s largest manufacturer of industrial rubber products, with plants in Kursk and Saransk. A unified accounting methodology for both plants.
Role
Project supervisor.
Result
Production, procurement, warehouse, treasury, fixed asset accounting, and R&D were modeled. Costing is based on the out-of-the-box functionality of 1C:ERP.UH.
400
planned user seats
1C:ERP.UH
2 plants
2024
year-long project

Biofood (Big Lunch)

1C:UPP → 1C:ERP, plant in the Tula region
Objective
Migrate a food production facility from 1C:UPP to 1C:ERP.
Role
Project manager, a team of 8 analysts.
Result
All plant processes were modeled in 1C:ERP and an implementation roadmap was drawn up; following it, the client launched the system in-house to save money.
12
process blocks
5
months
8
analysts
PetrozavodskMash — AEM-technologies, Rosatom

Also: PIK-Element — 1C:ERP go-live in assembly-line production (video case study), PetrozavodskMash — 1C:EAM (TOiR) in 2.5 months at an enterprise with 10,000+ employees, Techsnabexport (Rosatom group), Bashkirenergo.

How we work

AI handles the routine. Decisions and accountability stay with people

Most of the effort in 1C:ERP projects goes into documents: process procedures, technical specifications, user guides, and test scenarios. We prepare this part with AI assistants, while specialists review every document and are accountable for the result.

Based on pilot tasks, we estimate up to 20–30% less project effort.
This is not a guarantee. We’ll calculate the effect for your project after the business analysis.
01
Analysis of documents and requirements
Procedures, current reports, data exports — we quickly find contradictions and gaps.
02
Draft specifications and user guides
Analysts spend their time on substance, not formatting.
03
Test scenarios and verification
More checks before go-live, fewer surprises after.
Your data, your rules. Before the start, we agree with your security team which materials may be used with AI and which may not, and put it in the contract.
What to expect

A review is real work, not a sales call

1Step 1 · 2 minutes

Questionnaire

Your situation, scale, and system. So that I come prepared instead of spending half the meeting on questions.

2Step 2 · 30 minutes

Video call

—your situation and goals
—key risks
—options for action
—next step
3Step 3 · within 24 hours

Written summary

Three risks, three next steps, and questions worth asking your contractor. You can forward it to colleagues — it’s yours to keep either way.

What you won’t get:✕license sales✕a 20-slide company presentation✕“sign by Friday” pressure
Check with peers

Don’t take my word for it — check for yourself

Awards, reference letters from people who have been in your shoes, and publications — all of it can be verified.

1C:Project of the Year winner badgeTop award
1C · 2024

1C:Project of the Year winner

Category: “Best 1C migration project.” Migration of Lab Industries (Henkel) from SAP to 1C:ERP.UH, with CIFP among the contractors.

View →
“Information Technologies for Industry 2024” ranking badge
Ranking · 2024

“IT Leaders for Industry”

Top 30 overall; 6th place in food industry, 13th in ERP, 4th in HRM.

TAdviserCNews
TAdviser · CNews

Software import substitution projects

In the TAdviser ranking “Major software import substitution projects” (replacing foreign software): Lab Industries — 6th place and KFC (Unirest) — 9th (2022), LANIT — 17th (2023). CNews: 35th place in the HR Tech top 40.

PRO BIZNES TV
Personal · 2023–2025

Speaker and expert

Diploma from PRO BIZNES TV (2025) and a letter of appreciation from the “Moscow Region Business Guide” business forum (2023).

View →

Diplomas and letters of appreciation

Hover to see the original; click to open the diploma in a larger view.

At industry events

Anton Kulish in the PRO BIZNES TV studio26:08Watch on Rutube
PRO BIZNES TV · November 2025

“Technologies for Business”: interview with Anton Kulish

Why move to ERP and what problems it solves, how to assess the impact of an implementation, what issues arise during automation, and why industry specifics matter.

Host: Valentina Shelkovnikova. 26 minutes.

Open on Rutube →
Anton Kulish in a panel discussion at the Infostart “Analysis & Management in IT Projects” conference, 2024
Panel discussion at the Infostart “Analysis & Management in IT Projects” conference, 2024
Anton Kulish and Boris Nuraliev, founder of 1C Company, at the 1C:ERP Business Forum 2024
With Boris Nuraliev, founder of 1C. 1C:ERP Business Forum 2024
Anton Kulish with the Tsifrovizatsiya Proizvodstva (CIFP) team at the 1C:ERP Business Forum 2024
Our team at the 1C:ERP Business Forum 2024 — we exhibited at our own booth
Anton Kulish with the team at the Infostart “Analysis & Management in IT Projects” conference, 2024
With the team at the Infostart “Analysis & Management in IT Projects” conference, 2024
Anton Kulish. 1C:ERP Business Forum
1C:ERP Business Forum
Anton Kulish. Interview at the “Russian Industrialist” forum, 2024
Interview at the “Russian Industrialist” forum, 2024
Anton Kulish. Speaking at “Smart City”, VDNKh, 2025
Speaking at “Smart City”, VDNKh, 2025
Anton Kulish. At the company booth, Innoprom, 2025
At the company booth, Innoprom, 2025
Anton Kulish. Speaker at the “Moscow Region Business Guide” business forum
Speaker at the “Moscow Region Business Guide” business forum

Client testimonials

All tasks assigned to the contractor were completed.

A holding company’s migration from 1C:UPP to 1C:ERP.UH due to the end of support for 1C:UPP: two plants, 400 planned user seats. Anton is the project supervisor.

Rating: 5 out of 5
Signed letter →
D. S. Torshenko
IT Director, RubEx Group

…a responsible approach to the tasks at hand, initiative in developing solutions, and the team’s extensive expertise.

1C:ERP at an assembly-line plant producing prefabricated bathroom pods, go-live in January 2019. The project was led by Anton, then at ITB Consulting.

Rating: 5 out of 5
Signed letter →
A. A. Nazarov
Deputy Technical Director, PIK-Element (PIK Group)

We would like to express special thanks to consultant… Anton Sergeyevich Kulish for resolving the issues that arose promptly, thoroughly, and professionally.

Implementation of 1C:ERP Rosatom edition; the system has been put into full production use.

Signed letter →
S. S. Semenova
Chief Accountant, TENEX-Logistics (part of Rosatom)

Thank you to Anton Sergeyevich Kulish for his desire to get to the bottom of the problem, his dedication, and his incredible patience.

Automation of bank guarantee accounting: two complex reports and a configuration customization.

Signed letter →
E. Yu. Katkova
Chief Specialist, Bank Relations Department, Stroytransgaz

He demonstrated excellent analytical skills and initiative in developing and agreeing on technical specifications.

Implementation of 1C:MDM and user training; the system has been put into full production use.

Signed letter →
E. V. Kovyrzina
Head of Materials Supply Department, BashRES (Bashkirenergo)
Reference call

Talk to a client directly

On request, I’ll connect you with the client-side project manager at a company of similar size — after the review, if you decide to move forward.

Quotes are taken from reference letters on company letterhead. Click the letter below a testimonial to view the signed scan.

Publications and talks

“Russian Engineer” magazine, No. 01 (90), March 2026: interview with Anton Kulish
“Russian Engineer” magazine · No. 01 (90), March 2026“Automation ‘like clockwork’: what to know before implementing an ERP system”An interview with Anton Kulish: why a project starts with business analysis and process mapping, how to keep changes to the standard system to a minimum, and what problems most often keep manufacturers from completing their digital transformation.Open the magazine page →

Company profiles: TAdviser · ADPASS · all publications on cifp.ru

Booking

Book a project review

✓30-minute video call at a time that suits you✓Slots in the coming days — no waiting for weeks✓Written summary within 24 hours✓Reminder by email and Telegram the day before
Situation
Company
Contact details
Time
What’s your situation?
Prefer to message?
I reply personally. On a computer, scan the QR code with your phone; on a phone, just tap.
Call: +7 (916) 007-81-01
Winner of the 1C:Project of the Year 2024 award — best 1C migration project
Top 30 in “IT Leaders for Industry 2024”
5 out of 5 — performance rating in testimonials from RubEx Group and PIK Group
KFC Russia · RubEx Group · PIK · Bashkirenergo

The questionnaire helps ensure that consultations go to those they will genuinely help. Thank you for taking two minutes to fill it out.

Concerns

An honest look at what usually holds people back

Why do I need a consultant if I have a CIO?

I don’t replace your CIO. I offer an independent perspective that helps them make the case for decisions to senior management. Often the two of you come to the review together.

Free — so you’ll try to sell me something?

I don’t sell licenses. If you need help after the review, I’ll offer it. If you don’t, I’ll tell you so. Either way, the summary is yours to keep.

We already have a contractor

A second opinion doesn’t mean switching contractors. More often, it’s a way to get the project back on schedule and ask your contractor the right questions.

What about confidentiality?

The review doesn’t require access to your infobase. If needed, we’ll sign an NDA before the meeting.

All integrators are the same

Maybe. That’s why you’ll be talking not to a sales manager but to a project manager who has personally led implementations for 18 years.

Our revenue is under RUB 600 million (≈ $6 million)

The review is designed for mid-sized and large businesses. If your company is smaller, fill out the questionnaire anyway: I’ll point you in the right direction or suggest a different format.

In 30 minutes, you’ll know what to do next with your project

Migrating from 1C:UPP, a stalled implementation, or choosing a contractor — we’ll go through your situation, and within 24 hours I’ll send you a written plan: key risks, options, and the next step. The decision is yours.

Book a project review